Parable/ allegory
Right now i would like to talk about the parable and allegory since this is the latest topic that i have gone trough with my lecturer in class.
Before that, i would like to give some clarification the meaning of parable and allegory itself. As what i have learnt about this topic, parable or allegory brings the meaning that symbolic expression of a deeper meaning through a story or scene acted out by human, animal or mythical characters.
To make more understand about this topic, i have choose one drama that reflects with the topic of parable and allegory. The story that i would like to choose to reflects this thing is Merlin. Do you know about Merlin?
Ok, let me brief the story first. Merlin is an exciting fantasy series set in the mythic city of Camelot, but inspired by 21st Century telling. Before Merlin and Arthur became legends, they were ambitious young men looking for adventure hoping to live up to their families, expectations, discovering love and findings their own true destiny, making mistakes along the way. Actually Merlin is someone that have a power to cursing or curing people but he did not reveled the abilities that he has up when his friend, the king of Camelots know about it.
I choose the story is because the story have a deep meaning behind the story that same with The Seven Ages Of Man.
For the first, the prisoners that identified in that story drama is Sir Arthur.The chains is the punishment that Merlin will get whenever he shows his abilities to others. The fire is the problems that occurs in particular time. for the shadows and the images that identified in this story is Merlin. The puppet players is the Dinosour and for the old man is Gaius.
I choose Sir Arthur as the prisoners because he is the one the must not know the reality about Merlin identity and ability. Then, the chains is punishment that Merlin will get whenever he shows the abilities because Merlin can't to show his real identity and ability because whenever other person know about it, Merlin can not to take care of his friend or King of The Camelot. Furthermore, problems that occurs in certain time become the fire because whenever the situation is under control and do not need his help to ensure Sir Arthur in safe condition. Then, the shadows and the images is Merlin itself because whenever the fire or problems that occurs need Merlin to control, Merlin will show and use his ability to control the situation. The puppet players is the dinosaur because Merlin will see and meet with Dinasour to ask the opinion how to control and solve the problems that happened. Thus, Merlin action is controlled by the Dinosour. Lastly, the old man is Gaius. This is because Gaius is only the person that know about Merlin and specialty that Merlin have. So. whenever Gaius told the truth about Merlin to Sir Arthur, it actually open the chains and Sir Artur will shock and know the reality. At firrst, Sir Artur's eyes will hurts whenever he know the reality and the shadows which have been projected for many years. Then the only person that can explain towards Sir Artur about Merlin is Gaius that opened the chains that have in Sir Arthur but he still denied it since he was know and be friends with Merlin for a long time. Sir Arthur act like that because he is really trust with the illusions that have been projected towards him for a long time and then he trust that illusions that he have gone trough before is much more real than what he just know at that time.
In a conclusion, i found out that learning parable and allegory is something that really exciting, Although it make me more to think deeply, it is actually make me learnt how to think wisely.
- thank you-
Friday, 20 April 2012
Jack The Ripper
Who is jack the ripper? What so special about him that make people keep talking about him and make it as a history of London.
Actually Jack the ripper remained that popular is because one important reason which is the serial killer that happen in Whitechapel. The name called as Jack The Ripper just because the killer crime that he had done which is killing the prostitutes at in the East End of London in 1888. The name actually inventions of a letter that written by someone claiming to be a murderer that was disseminated in the media.
The others nickname that used to described the killer at that time were " The Whitechapel Murderer and 'Leather Apron'. Although the murder only happen in a small section of the comunity which is the prostitues, it still give a big immpact towards other comunity and societies.
Generally, Jack The ripper is known by killing five victims which names as Mary Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddowes and Marry Kelly. All of the victims are killed terribly with a modus operandi such as same type of wounds, deep throats slashes, abdominal and genital area mutilation and in some cases a complete removal of internal organ. Regarding about the cases, there are lots of suspects that being recognized such as Carl Feigenbaum,James Kelly, Sir John Williams and many more. In my point of view, i would like to suspects more on James Kelly since i do a research about him to practice as a defended and prosecutor in my class.
Why i pick James Kelly as the Jack The Ripper? In my background reading, there are lots of information that can links James Kelly as the killer. One of that is Kelly has a deep insane that lead him to bring the Broudmour Asylum. This is because Kelly was suspected killing his wife, Sarah in 1883. The factor that lead act like is because he felt the lack of intimacy with Sarah and the feelings is actually as the factor Kelly began to seek the company with prostitutes which resulted him contracting a venerable disease. After that, his mood and behavior had begun to change, and he was suffering from nasty. Based on my claimed, it cab prove that Jamses Kelly is the truth suspect for the connicle five. This is because Kelly killed the 5 prostitutes to show the revenge towards the groups that give him a venerable disease. Then, because of that, he was diagnosed Paranoid Schizohrenic that contributes to false beliefs (delusions) and the consciousness of kelly was down and he become insane.
Furthermore, according to one pages that state Kelly as the Ripper is when Kelly is actually located in London around the time Jack The Ripper murder. This claimed becomes more confirms when the first killed is happen in London. It is certainly happen quite possible, maybe even probable that he was indeed the true culprit of these incredibly vicious and almost the cruel killer.
In a conclusion, i really want to appoint and stand with my view that Jack the Ripper is actually James Kelly.
Who is jack the ripper? What so special about him that make people keep talking about him and make it as a history of London.
Actually Jack the ripper remained that popular is because one important reason which is the serial killer that happen in Whitechapel. The name called as Jack The Ripper just because the killer crime that he had done which is killing the prostitutes at in the East End of London in 1888. The name actually inventions of a letter that written by someone claiming to be a murderer that was disseminated in the media.
The others nickname that used to described the killer at that time were " The Whitechapel Murderer and 'Leather Apron'. Although the murder only happen in a small section of the comunity which is the prostitues, it still give a big immpact towards other comunity and societies.
Generally, Jack The ripper is known by killing five victims which names as Mary Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddowes and Marry Kelly. All of the victims are killed terribly with a modus operandi such as same type of wounds, deep throats slashes, abdominal and genital area mutilation and in some cases a complete removal of internal organ. Regarding about the cases, there are lots of suspects that being recognized such as Carl Feigenbaum,James Kelly, Sir John Williams and many more. In my point of view, i would like to suspects more on James Kelly since i do a research about him to practice as a defended and prosecutor in my class.
Why i pick James Kelly as the Jack The Ripper? In my background reading, there are lots of information that can links James Kelly as the killer. One of that is Kelly has a deep insane that lead him to bring the Broudmour Asylum. This is because Kelly was suspected killing his wife, Sarah in 1883. The factor that lead act like is because he felt the lack of intimacy with Sarah and the feelings is actually as the factor Kelly began to seek the company with prostitutes which resulted him contracting a venerable disease. After that, his mood and behavior had begun to change, and he was suffering from nasty. Based on my claimed, it cab prove that Jamses Kelly is the truth suspect for the connicle five. This is because Kelly killed the 5 prostitutes to show the revenge towards the groups that give him a venerable disease. Then, because of that, he was diagnosed Paranoid Schizohrenic that contributes to false beliefs (delusions) and the consciousness of kelly was down and he become insane.
Furthermore, according to one pages that state Kelly as the Ripper is when Kelly is actually located in London around the time Jack The Ripper murder. This claimed becomes more confirms when the first killed is happen in London. It is certainly happen quite possible, maybe even probable that he was indeed the true culprit of these incredibly vicious and almost the cruel killer.
In a conclusion, i really want to appoint and stand with my view that Jack the Ripper is actually James Kelly.
Saturday, 24 March 2012
Are You Romantic or Libertine?
From the excerpt " Are You Romantic Or Libertine"by M. Scott Peck. M.D. is actually the excerpt from his best selling book, " The Road Less Traveled". This is a little about the author M.Scott Peck, M.D. he was an American psychiatrist and he was born in New York. The book " The Road Less Traveled" was published in 1987 and the book was very popular because the content and the attribution is based largely on his experiences as a psychiatrist and a person. The excerpt is based on the second section in his book "The Road Less Traveled" that talk more about love and his consider it as a nature love and driving force behind spiritual growth. In the excerpt, it has stated that love is paradox just because most dictionaries do not define love but only describe its symptoms. It did not explain the mix feelings of hatred and resentment that human beings have at the same time. According to the author, since love is hard to define one can only know love by its "symptoms". which is an intense ambivalence feeling of affection and resentment, with strong longing to be with the beloved object. After that, romance has been defined as a prevailing sense of wonder or mystery surrounding the mutual attract person. Unfortunately, since love is different of set of thinking and feeling, people need to consort to "something" and the thing is known as "romance ritual" that engaged romantic activity among people. Accordingly, there are two kinds of romance ritual. For the first is obligatory romance where the lover will celebrate the beloved object's birthday, getting her a gift for any special day or acknowledging their anniversary. Next, optional romance where the lover will try to come out with different kinds of ideas, big or small in order to impress or to assure they are still in the beloved object's good graces such as sending funny greeting cards,candle light dinners weekend gateways and whole lot more.- Critical Literacy (com 2533). Both of them are differ from courtly love which is a relationship that is built on the basis of the unexplained feelings that one has over a person. The person that are practiced in courtly love are known as the romantic and when the person become a romantic person, they will treat their beloved as something that very special and precious and something that very hard to posses. In contrast, the people of the darker side or oppose of courtly love is known as a libertine. This is because they manipulate the romantic code and conduct not because to attain the ideal love but only for their own sheer personal delight. The most famous person that developed the concepts of libertine adventurer and writer the Giacomo Casanova. For the last, the author want the readers to know weather to being romantic or libertine. After that, people can differentiates the benefits or disadvantages become a romantic person or libertine. In my point of view, the excerpt is really interesting because it make me thing deeply whether to become a romantic or libertine and what are the outcomes to become like that and the quotations that really capture my attraction is the question" should one put aside his or her personal feeling and put the beloved object's feeling first?" . what do you think about it..???
Friday, 23 March 2012
who are your friends?
Who are your friends? Is they are boys or girl?Since last thursday are the Friendship Days in colleges, i would like to write up about the friends issues. Before that, let we define first about the meaning of friends. What actually meaning by friends itself?Friends are actually defined as a person that will share a same goal with us in term of behavior, opinion or how the way to act in a society. In other meaning, "Friendship, as understood here, is a distinctively personal relationship that is grounded in a concern on the part of each friend for the welfare of the other, for the other's sake, and that involves some degree of intimacy. As such, friendship is undoubtedly central to our lives, in part because the special concern we have for our friends must have a place within a broader set of concerns, including moral concerns, and in part because our friends can help shape who we are as persons. Given this centrality, important questions arise concerning the justification of friendship and, in this context, whether it is permissible to “trade up” when someone new comes along, as well as concerning the possibility of reconciling the demands of friendship with the demands of morality in cases in which the two seem to conflict." by The Stanford Encyclupedoa of Philosophy.I also being interested with a quotation which is " whenever A friend is someone we turn to when our spirits need a lift.A friend is someone we treasure for our friendship is a gift.A friend is someone who fills our lives with beauty, joy and grace.And makes the world we live in a better and happier place. From the quotations above, it is really shows that friends plays a important part in each life. without friends, people will not get any happiness in life.In contrary, what happened to the friends that are fickle? What are you feelings about?Fickle friends is erratic behavior", "fickle weather", "mercurial twists of temperament", "a quicksilver character, cool and willful at one moment, utterly fragile the next"- according to http://www.mnemonicdictionary.com. Then, according to the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, the meaning of ambivalent is having or showing both good and bad feeling about something. so, friends those who are fickle and ambivalent are better to avoid in order to not facing any unexpected thing happens. From the excerpt by Kirsten Weir, "Fickle Friends" it is actually give the audience views about the fickle or ambivalent friendship which is give a bad or negative effect towards the other friends. For example, as stated in the excerpt, the research that was done blood pressure were typically higher when individuals encountered ambivalent friends than when they saw a supportive friends. Then, other research also suggest that ambivalent friends can lower resistance to stress. this is because the more ambivalent friends a person had, the higher his or her heart rate and blood pressure were. In conclusion, the excerpt shows the reader about which kind of friend are better to befriends. As stated by William Ellery, sincerity, truth, faithfulness, come into the very essence of friendship.
Sunday, 18 March 2012
Pirates Of Silicon Valley
Do you know about the movie entitle as Pirates Of Silicon Valley?
Let we review about the movie.
Movie of the Pirates of Silicon Valley directed by Martyn Burke. The story is directed based on the book "Fire in the Valley: The Making of The Personal Computer" by Paul Freiberger and Michael Swaine. As stated by www.wikipedia.org.com"The film shows the impact on the development of the personal computer of the rivalry between Apple Computer and Microsoft. The rivalry happened in the time period from the early 1970s to 1997, when Steve Jobs ( Noah Wyle) and Bill Gates (Anthony Michael Hall) develop a partnership after Jobs returns to Apple Computer.
It aired on Turner Network Television on April 6 & 7, 1999. The movie was starred by those who are talented actor such as Noah Wyle, Anthony Michael Hall, Joey Slotnick, John Di Maggio, Josh Hopkins, Jeffrey Nordling and Noah Wyle is the main actor as Steve Jobs in this movie. His action really can make the audience see the truth about Steve Jobs. The film is actually tell the readers about the revolution of computer technologies.
The first Machintosh was produced by Steve Jobs and the film also show the audience about the rivalry and the struggling of Steve jobs during his early life of education in college, the strive of himself to continue with his ingenious idea about the invention of useful and powerful technology and to built up the global corporate empires of Apple Computer Corporation and Microsoft Inc. Then, the story depictions about four people or two partnerships which is Apple Computert co founders Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak ( Joey Slotnick) and Gates ans Steve Ballmer (John Di Maggio).
It shows how Apple grabbed the idea of the GUI from Xerox, how Microsoft got the first DOS from someone else, and how Microsoft started making its own interfaces.The Pirates Of The Silicon Valley also viewed the ingenious of co founder Apple that is Steve Jobs to ensure there is no one that can duplicates his idea until he struggle to grabbed the idea of the GUI from Xerox.
The moral value that people can gained after watched the movie is the determination will not be able to break any dream. This is because, whenever people get the inspiration to do something people must not to stop even there are have a lot of hardness.
The moral value that people can gained after watched the movie is the determination will not be able to break any dream. This is because, whenever people get the inspiration to do something people must not to stop even there are have a lot of hardness.
Monday, 12 March 2012
Thinking Folly?
~THINKING FOLLY~
From the excerpt entitle as Thinking Folly by Eckhart Tollle is told about the thinking process towards people in life. The famous and well known book by Eckhart is " The Power Of Now". He is one of thinker that assumed people actually do not thinking for make a benefits but the minds that are actually possessed people.
Echart Tolle's occupation is as a writer or public speaker and he was experienced as contemporaneous spiritual teacher and he is the person that who is not aligned with any particular religion or traditions. Eckhrat Tolle was born on 1948 at Lunen Germany.
After i have read the excerpt i can conclude that the author tries to conveys the message that thinking process is one of important part that can shape or represents people itself. In my opinion, Eckhart come up with the statement or philosophy just because affected by his background. For example, according to www.wikipedia.org. his childhood time was unhappy, particularly his early childhood in Germany. After that, his parents fought and eventually separated, and he felt alienated from a hostile school environment. Eckhart also experienced during World War Two that can lead his depressed by his experienced and lead him to thinking for a lot and come up with the relevant philosopher about people's life. Although Eckhart was experienced many hardship in his life, he still can survive his life just because he thinking for the best for himself and tries o make a transformation in his life not immitate from his track record.
According to the excerpt by Eckhart Tolle, mind is essentially a survival machine that attack and defense against other minds, gathering, storing and analyzing information but after all that good things that minds can act, not all of the results are creative. He also stated that thinking process creates an opaque screen of concepts, labels, images, words, judgement and definitions that blocks all true relationship. From what has been stated by Eckhart Tolle, he wants to let people know that all the things that happened to any people are based from how and what the people thinking for themselves.
Afterward, thinking also has been defined as a disease by the author just because it is not so much that people use the mind wrongly but people are actually do not use the mind at all. The reality is people are act like a slave that follow the mind thinking. It is meaning by the possesses.
As a conclusion people are need to use their mind to think wisely and try to transform from worse to better. Do not let your mind possessed yourself and controlled it with a good thinking.
Sunday, 11 March 2012
steve jobs
Do you know about Steve Jobs? Who is he? and what contribution that he was gives toward people life?
There is a little bit about Steve Jobs, his full name is Steven Paul Jobs, was born on 24 february 1955 in San Francisco, california, U.S. he also become as Co-founder, Chairman and CEO, Apple Inc, Co-founder and CEO, Pixar, Co-founder and CEO, Next Inc, and for the most precious think about him is , he was widely recognized by other people as a charismatic forge of the personal computer revolution through the invention of Apple. Steve Jobs was death in October of 2011.
From the excerpt of The Steve Jobs Nobody Knew by Jeff Goodell, the content of the excerpt is about Steve Jobs's life. At the first time i go through the excerpt, the thing that cross in my mind is what the intention or messages that Jeff Goodell try to convey to the readers about Steve Jobs actually? Then, after i have gone troughs the excerpt until the end i got something that can me impressed about him. From the excerpt, Jeff Goodell is actually tries to conveys or delivered his messages that Steve Jobs's successfullness is actually causes from his attitudes.Based on what that Jeff Goodell assumed about Steve Jobs is he was an abrasive man personality and he is unapologetic person.
Steve Jobs also like to act cruelly towards other employees, he love to tossing them aside. From one side of opinion, people might think that he is only a cruel and arrogant employer. Nevertheless, i think Steve Jobs has his own right to do like that towards his employees just because he want to make improvement for his company. After that, Steve Jobs also described by the author as a person that never believe on the consumers right. Steve Jobs always claimed that he is the one that can do any decision and no one can influenced him. For me it is one of a good example that can be imitates by others because we need to have a strong self esteem and confident level in order to achieve any target or ambition. People really need to put the good looks on themselves to ensure have a strength and can become a endure person when facing any failure or obstacles.
So, i think i will make Steve Jobs as one of my idol in term his attitudes to make a move up in life. Successful without hardship do not precious as a hardship before success.
There is a little bit about Steve Jobs, his full name is Steven Paul Jobs, was born on 24 february 1955 in San Francisco, california, U.S. he also become as Co-founder, Chairman and CEO, Apple Inc, Co-founder and CEO, Pixar, Co-founder and CEO, Next Inc, and for the most precious think about him is , he was widely recognized by other people as a charismatic forge of the personal computer revolution through the invention of Apple. Steve Jobs was death in October of 2011.
From the excerpt of The Steve Jobs Nobody Knew by Jeff Goodell, the content of the excerpt is about Steve Jobs's life. At the first time i go through the excerpt, the thing that cross in my mind is what the intention or messages that Jeff Goodell try to convey to the readers about Steve Jobs actually? Then, after i have gone troughs the excerpt until the end i got something that can me impressed about him. From the excerpt, Jeff Goodell is actually tries to conveys or delivered his messages that Steve Jobs's successfullness is actually causes from his attitudes.Based on what that Jeff Goodell assumed about Steve Jobs is he was an abrasive man personality and he is unapologetic person.
Steve Jobs also like to act cruelly towards other employees, he love to tossing them aside. From one side of opinion, people might think that he is only a cruel and arrogant employer. Nevertheless, i think Steve Jobs has his own right to do like that towards his employees just because he want to make improvement for his company. After that, Steve Jobs also described by the author as a person that never believe on the consumers right. Steve Jobs always claimed that he is the one that can do any decision and no one can influenced him. For me it is one of a good example that can be imitates by others because we need to have a strong self esteem and confident level in order to achieve any target or ambition. People really need to put the good looks on themselves to ensure have a strength and can become a endure person when facing any failure or obstacles.
So, i think i will make Steve Jobs as one of my idol in term his attitudes to make a move up in life. Successful without hardship do not precious as a hardship before success.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)